FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS ABOUT EVIDENCE AND OUTCOME

  1. Haven't neurosurgeons always acted based on the best evidence?
    We thought so. However, in the past 20 years there has been a new focus on evidence quality. It is now recognized that many of the "studies" upon which we based treatment in the past were flawed because of the biases of the patients and surgeons, both of whom desired a good result so much that they might inadvertently overlook problems in treatment or diagnosis. The techniques of performing clinical studies have improved and are much better understood. This allows a new understanding of what constitutes "best evidence" and therefore a reinterpretation of past information. In some circumstances this has lead to abandoning useless surgical procedures. In others, it has validated procedures that many non-surgeons doubted.

  2. Does "evidence-based medicine" mean I'm a "guinea pig"?
    No. Evidence-based medicine is practiced using the best available existing evidence. The patient does not have to participate in a research project in order to obtain the benefits of evidence-based practice. However, because the evidence base is limited, surgeons who practice evidence-based medicine are often working to increase the quality and quantity of available evidence by carrying out clinical research. You may be offered the chance to help out by participating in such a project. If so, your participation is entirely voluntary and a decision to participate or not will have no positive or negative influence on the care you receive.

 

[contact us]